What is happening?

• This week, Celsius Network announced that it was pausing all withdrawals, swaps, and transfers between accounts in their platform due to extreme market conditions. It did not provide a timeline for resuming withdrawals. This move has raised concerns about Celsius’ solvency, which brings back old discussions regarding the risks of Celsius’ business model and external counterparty risks.
  • Celsius is a centralized finance (CeFi) and permissioned lending and borrowing platform, founded in 2017 by Alex Mashinsky and headquartered in London. It offers customers up to 18% annual returns on deposits of several cryptocurrencies and stablecoins.
  • Celsius raised $750 million in a Series B round last November, when it was valued at $3.25 billion (post-money). At the time of the capital raise, it said total assets on its platform were $25 billion (up from $10 billion in March 2021) with more than one million registered users.
•  We believe that Celsius is currently undergoing an asset and liability mismanagement issue due to concentrated positions on less liquid assets such as stETH (staked Ether).
  • Celsius is suffering several withdrawals and apparently it does not have enough liquid assets in its balance sheet to honor them.
• Since Celsius is a CeFi company, there is no clear picture of their financial position or treasury management strategy, so some of the views expressed might not be 100% precise due to lack of full data transparency.
• This incident comes at a delicate moment after several negative events hit the crypto markets in 2022, including a couple of massive hacks, the Terra / LUNA stablecoin meltdown, and a highly uncertain macro environment with inflation hitting 40-year high levels and with the Fed-driven successive increases in interest rates.

 What does Celsius do?

• Celsius (1) DeFi protocols to generate yields from customers' deposits, (2) lends on an overcollateralized manner cryptocurrencies to centralized exchanges, and (3) stakes crypto assets when such a functionality is available.
• In particular, a lot of the ETH it holds on behalf of clients is staked using (i) Lido (a “liquid staking” platform), and also (ii) directly into the Ethereum 2.0 staking contract. This strategy concentrates a relevant portion of its deposited ETH into less-liquid assets (in the case of Lido staking), and into completely illiquid assets (as of now) when staking is done directly.
  • Lido is a liquid staking service that allows any ETH holder to deposit their holdings and participate in staking for Ethereum in the Beacon Chain, while the Ethereum network prepares for its upgrade from Proof-of-Work to Proof-of-Stake (for more details on that migration, refer to our recently published article on “The Merge”). In exchange, depositors receive a synthetic token called stETH, representing a redeem certificate for ETH at a later moment after Ethereum’s migration, which currently generates approximately annual returns of 4%.

Celsius has become one of the main players exposed to stETH, with a balance (as of June 13, 2022) of around 410k stETH (~11% of the total supply of 3.5M stETH), which is used as collateral in major DeFi protocols like AAVE to generate additional yield.

• Since, as of now, stETH cannot be redeemed for ETH on Lido, stETH holders have to rely on secondary markets like Curve—a decentralized exchange that has the largest liquidity pool for the stETH:ETH pair—for liquidity.
• This pool has become very imbalanced since last week, with around 81% of the tokens deposited coming from stETH (~500k stETH) and 19% from ETH (~118k ETH) (originally this pool was stabilized at around 50/50 ratio).
• The pool imbalance made stETH trade at a discount of around 6% (as of June 13, 2022) due to its illiquidity aspect.
• Any price movement affecting ETH negatively might worsen the situation for the stETH used as collateral, given that the amount of stETH necessary to clear Celsius’ debt with Aave will have to be bigger.

 Community members have been assessing Celsius’ (i) incapacity to convert stETH back to ETH and/or (ii) the likelihood of stETH used as collateral in DeFi protocols to be liquidated on-chain. These two events could impair Celsius’ ability to pay ETH withdrawal requests on its platform. This could also lead Celsius to liquidate other crypto assets that it holds on its balance sheet at any price.

 

What’s happening now?

• This morning (June 14, 2022), Celsius’ competitor Nexo expressed interest in buying certain assets from Celsius (no price was mentioned), including collateralized loan receivables secured by corresponding collateral assets, brand assets, and its customer database. This could bring some momentary relief if completed quickly.
  • The Celsius’ CEL utility token has lost more than 50% of its value after announcing halting of withdrawals. NEXO utility token is down 20% in the past 24 hours amid a market-wide sell-off.
• At this moment, it is still unclear how this issue will completely unfold. Celsius is a large holder of ETH and BTC. We also don’t know the pace of users’ withdrawals. However, Celsius' $750 million Series-B capital raise in November 2021 might give it some breathing room.
• stETH has value (assuming that The Merge will occur and no smart contract issues regarding Lido surfaces); however, there might not be enough liquidity to account for Celsius immediate needs.
• Celsius, in theory, could unload all of its stETH position in a private over the counter transaction (possibly at a large discount) and it could buy itself some time. However, if such a transaction were not to occur, Celsius depositors would probably suffer considerably as they would only have access to their deposited ETH funds when unstaking becomes available after The Merge. This may also pose cascading effects impacting the price of other digital assets Celsius holds on behalf of customers, since the platform might need to liquidate other token holdings at any market price to be able to honor clients’ positions in stablecoins and other crypto assets.

 What’s next?

Unfortunately, this event brings more uncertainty to an already fragile crypto market. It can have secondary consequences to overall total value locked (TVL) in DeFi, which can potentially mean less activity on the protocols and further drawdowns for the tokens associated with them.

The crypto markets will remain susceptible to idiosyncratic factors like the Celsius situation, in addition to broader macroeconomic factors such as the inflation and recession concerns unfolding right now. However, we continue to believe that the crypto ecosystem remains strong, and the long-term outlook for this emerging asset class is as promising as it has ever been. 

 

 

---

 

This material is intended for information purposes only, and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation or an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any securities to any person in any jurisdiction in which an offer, solicitation, purchase or sale would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction. The opinions expressed are as of February 2022 and are subject to change without notice. Recipients should consult their own advisors, including tax advisors, before making any investment decision.
This material is not an offer to sell or the request of an offer to buy the securities or other instruments mentioned. If any offer and sale of securities is made, it will be in accordance with the confidential offering memorandum (the “OM”) of the respective fund and only in jurisdictions where permitted by law. The OM describes risks related to an investment in the fund (including loss of the entire investment) and will qualify and supersede the information presented in this letter. Investors should refer to the OM for more complete information about the fund, including certain investment risks, management fees and fund expenses. This letter does not constitute part of any OM or other offering document. Investment in any fund is highly speculative and is not intended as a complete investment program. It is designed only for sophisticated persons who can bear the economic risk of the loss of their entire investment in the fund and who have limited need for liquidity in their investment. There can be no assurance that the mentioned funds will achieve its investment objective or return any capital. Certain information contained herein has been obtained from third-party sources and have not been independently verified by Hashdex, which assumes no responsibility for the accuracy thereof.

This information is not directed at or intended for distribution to or use by any person or entity located in any jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to applicable law or regulation or which would subject Hashdex to any registration or licensing requirements within such jurisdiction. No part of this material may be (i) copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form by any means or (ii) redistributed without the prior written consent of Hashdex. By receiving or reviewing this material, you agree that this material is confidential intellectual property of Hashdex and that you will not directly or indirectly copy, modify, recast, publish or redistribute this material and the information therein, in whole or in part, or otherwise make any commercial use of this material without Hashdex’s prior written consent. All rights reserved.