The native token for Gala Games (GALA) fell more than 12% after confusion about the token's supply led many people to believe the network experienced a $1 billion hack.
The event was not a malicious hack, but resulted from a cross-chain bridge issuing $1 billion of a synthetic version of the GALA token (pGALA).
The President of Blockchain at Gala, a play-to-earn gaming company, said the company was unaware these synthetic tokens would be minted.
After this misunderstanding was discovered, GALA — a holding in the Hashdex Crypto Metaverse ETF — recovered to a level in line with its price prior to the event.
The episode underscores the challenges that can arise as blockchain networks increasingly interact with one another, impacting the investment case for these networks.
The crypto community is very familiar with the bridge hacks that have occurred this year. However, a recent episode that took place in pNetwork, a cross-chain bridge that supports the minting of synthetic versions of Ethereum-native assets on the BNB Smart Chain, was mistaken for a malicious hack. The exploit involved GALA, the native token for Gala Games — a blockchain-based play-to-earn gaming platform that rewards players with digital assets for their in-game accomplishments — and consisted of a tremendous amount of GALA tokens being minted out of the blue.
On November 3, approximately $1 billion worth of pGALA tokens were suddenly minted in the BNB Smart Chain by a single blockchain address, raising immediate concerns in the crypto community. The tokens had been minted and started being offloaded on the popular decentralized exchange PancakeSwap, in what seemed to be another hacker attack. However, according to recent tweets from pNetwork’s official profile, the episode was a major misunderstanding that ended up causing their GALA bridge to be halted temporarily.
After an alleged “misconfiguration” was identified in their bridge contracts, pNetwork has intentionally minted tokens to protect holders from having a malicious actor exploit the bridge vulnerability and drained the BNB/pGALA PancakeSwap pool in order to disincentivize the trade of pGALA tokens, which had just become not redeemable. Regarding this white hat situation, a pNetwork representative said “We regret any inconvenience this may have caused to the community and we will endeavor to avoid these issues in the future.” This is a common method to solve security breaches in smart contract platforms and had the express purpose of mitigating potential vulnerability in their bridge. Additionally, the pNetwork representative also claimed that “All GALA tokens on Ethereum as well as the underlying bridge collateral are SAFE.”
At first, pGALA’s token price plunged 94% and the community saw panic levels go over the top, and the Ethereum-based GALA displayed a 12.5% decline. However, after both pNetwork and Gala publicly explained what happened, markets calmed down. GALA token prices are fluctuating at a fairly regular level, with its pair with USD-pegged stablecoins being traded at somewhat the same price as one week prior to the incident.
According to Jason Brink, the president of blockchain at Gala Games, the company was not pleased with the way pNetwork handled the situation. He revealed that the pNetwork did not consult his team before minting a whopping amount of tokens, which led to his frustration.
As both pNetwork and Gala Games have made public announcements on the matter, what initially seemed to be a major hack turned out to be just a misunderstanding. Bad press is never a good thing for a serious company’s roadmap, but it seems that today’s event won’t amount to a major problem for the Gala Games ecosystem and token. Naturally, we’ll keep monitoring the aftermath of this episode, and will update investors on future outcomes if necessary.
To learn more about the impact of these events on the crypto asset class, visit our Research Center and subscribe to our newsletter.
 In blockchain contexts, bridges facilitate communication between blockchains through the transfer of information and assets.
 Cross-chain technology refers to a tool that allows assets to flow between unrelated blockchains. It uses a smart contract to allow networks to interact seamlessly.
 A white hat hacker is an individual who uses hacking skills to identify security vulnerabilities in software or networks.
This material expresses Hashdex Asset Management Ltd. and its subsidiaries and affiliates (“Hashdex”)'s opinion for informational purposes only and does not consider the investment objectives, financial situation or individual needs of one or a particular group of investors. We recommend consulting specialized professionals for investment decisions. Investors are advised to carefully read the prospectus or regulations before investing their funds. The information and conclusions contained in this material may be changed at any time, without prior notice. Nothing contained herein constitutes an offer, solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment management product or service. This information is not directed at or intended for distribution to or use by any person or entity located in any jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to applicable law or regulation or which would subject Hashdex to any registration or licensing requirements within such jurisdiction. No part of this material may be (i) copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form by any means or (ii) redistributed without the prior written consent of Hashdex. By receiving or reviewing this material, you agree that this material is confidential intellectual property of Hashdex and that you will not directly or indirectly copy, modify, recast, publish or redistribute this material and the information therein, in whole or in part, or otherwise make any commercial use of this material without Hashdex’s prior written consent.
Investment in any investment vehicle and cryptoassets is highly speculative and is not intended as a complete investment program. It is designed only for sophisticated persons who can bear the economic risk of the loss of their entire investment and who have limited need for liquidity in their investment. There can be no assurance that the investment vehicles will achieve its investment objective or return any capital. No guarantee or representation is made that Hashdex’s investment strategy, including, without limitation, its business and investment objectives, diversification strategies or risk monitoring goals, will be successful, and investment results may vary substantially over time. Nothing herein is intended to imply that the Hashdex s investment methodology or that investing any of the protocols or tokens listed in the Information may be considered “conservative,” “safe,” “risk free,” or “risk averse.”
Certain information contained herein (including financial information) has been obtained from published and non-published sources. Such information has not been independently verified by Hashdex, and Hashdex does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of such information. Hashdex does not provide tax, accounting or legal advice. Certain information contained herein constitutes forward-looking statements, which can be identified by the use of terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “project,” “estimate,” “intend,” “continue” “believe” (or the negatives thereof) or other variations thereof. Due to various risks and uncertainties, including those discussed above, actual events or results, the ultimate business or activities of Hashdex and its investment vehicles or the actual performance of Hashdex, its investment vehicles, or digital tokens may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. As a result, investors should not rely on such forward- looking statements in making their investment decisions. None of the information contained herein has been filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or any other governmental or self-regulatory authority. No governmental authority has opined on the merits of Hashdex’s investment vehicles or the adequacy of the information contained herein.